![]() ![]() The cargo deficit and 2nd row legroom, both reduce by 1 cu-ft and 1-inch respectively when the same Trailblazer is pitted against the CX-30. As the integration of automatic climate control and cabin humidity sensor become the commoner for that extra penny with a constant cargo capacity of 25.3-54.4 cu-ft.Ĭoming to the number highlights a cargo volume that is 6.1 cu-ft more inside the Trailblazer than the Kona with 4-inch better rear legroom. ![]() The Chevrolet Trailblazer is simply a character with different complexions as the vibes get dense when optional extension such as Convenience Package at $520 is called upon. On the other hand, both Hyundai Kona and Kia Seltos have been designed with 30 lb-ft lower torque that gives hauling band in the hands of Chevrolet. This allows the CX-30 to be quicker than the Trailblazer on the straights while 0-60 MPH by more than 1.8 seconds. Considering the braking efficiency, its 11.8-inch front and 10.4-inch rear disc brakes halt it in less than 174 ft from 70-0 MPH irrespective of the trim.Ĭosting almost the same, the Mazda CX-30 bashes 49 hp higher power and 24 lb-ft more torque than the Chevy Trailblazer. Not just that, a top speed of up to 130 MPH is certain on your dashboard with that engine. The Trailblazer has no official 0-60 MPH timing for its smaller ECOTEC engine but one might accelerate to 60 MPH from standstill within 9.4 seconds when the 1.3L Turbo I-3 beats.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |